Water hygiene β’ Stagnation risk β’ Automatic line flushing
Touchless faucets reduce touch points and help control water use. But in buildings with uneven occupancy, long stretches of low use can increase water age. Automatic purge cycles (automatic line flushing) can support a broader water management plan when sized, commissioned, and maintained correctly.
What an automatic purge cycle is
An automatic purge cycle is a programmed event where the faucet runs water for a defined time or volume without a user present. The intent is usually to reduce stagnant water in small branches, help maintain disinfectant residual and water quality at points of use, exercise valves after idle periods, and in some strategies rinse drains (site dependent).
Why stagnation matters in real buildings
Stagnation can show up in new construction when occupancy is phased, wings are rarely used, tenant fit-outs stall, or low-flow designs reduce turnover in long branches. Stagnant water can contribute to disinfectant residual decay and odor complaints, scale settling that later clogs strainers and outlets, temperature drift in branches and mixing valves, and higher risk of pathogen growth under the right conditions.
Public health guidance generally treats stagnation control as part of a broader water management program, not a single product feature. When risk profiles call for it, align purge cycles with a documented WMP.
Purge cycles are a control measure, not the whole plan
A practical way to treat purge cycles is as a point-of-use control measure that supports a WMP. They tend to make sense in schools with breaks, airports with uneven concourse usage, stadiums between events, offices with vacant floors or hybrid schedules, and healthcare only with infection-control review and validation.
Match purge volume to pipe volume
The most common purge mistake is guessing a duration that βsounds reasonable.β If the branch volume is larger than the purge volume, you may not exchange the stagnant water you are trying to address. Tie purge duration (or target volume) to the volume of water in the branch serving the faucet.
For defensible specifications, calculate purge duration from verified branch volume and measured outlet flow rather than relying on arbitrary timer settings.
Table 1: Purge sizing inputs to document
| Input | Why it matters | Where to get it |
|---|---|---|
| Branch line diameter and length | Drives water volume and water age | As-builts, field measurements |
| Flow rate at outlet (gpm) | Converts volume into time | Submittals, measured flow at fixture |
| Mixed vs cold-only flushing | Temperature affects risk conditions and energy | Plumbing design and infection-control input |
| Use pattern | Determines whether purge is needed | Facility ops and occupancy schedules |
| Drain capacity and trap condition | Prevents overflow and odor issues | Field verification |
Purge parameters to specify
A purge cycle has three levers: frequency, duration or target volume, and timing window. Coordinate across floors and restroom banks so you do not purge everything at once.
Table 2: Practical purge targets by building condition
| Building condition | Stagnation risk | Purge approach | Key caution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Always-busy public restrooms | Low | Often unnecessary | Avoid wasting water |
| Office floors with partial occupancy | Medium | Off-hours periodic purge for low-use zones | Coordinate timing to avoid noise complaints |
| Seasonal facilities | High | Purge after idle periods and during low-use weeks | Validate drains and water quality objectives |
| Healthcare patient care areas | Higher consequence | Purge only under WMP and infection-control plan | Do not assume purge alone solves pathogen risk |
Commissioning checklist for purge cycles
A. Pre-commissioning checks
- Confirm drains are clear and traps are functional
- Confirm stop valves and filters are accessible
- Verify outlet flow rate on site
- Confirm mixing strategy, especially with thermostatic mixing valves
- Confirm a WMP exists (or is being developed) if purge is justified for hygiene risk control
B. Program settings and document them
- Purge frequency
- Purge duration or target volume
- Time window (after-hours vs occupied hours)
- Per-restroom-bank coordination
C. Validate flushing actually exchanges water
- Measure outlet flow (gpm)
- Confirm purge time produces enough volume to clear the local branch
- Follow the WMP monitoring approach if water-quality metrics are required
D. Confirm the purge does not create new problems
- No overflow, no persistent oversplash outside the basin
- No nuisance activations that confuse users
- No unacceptable after-hours noise or drain gurgling
- No repeated short cycling that wears valves
Manual flushing vs automatic purge
Table 3: Manual fixture flushing vs automatic purge cycles
| Approach | Strengths | Weaknesses | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manual flushing program | Easy to understand, can be targeted to specific wings | Depends on staff compliance, inconsistent documentation | Smaller buildings with stable routines |
| Automatic purge cycles | Consistent, scalable across sites | Can waste water if mis-sized, can overflow if drains fail, needs commissioning | Large portfolios, variable occupancy, campuses, airports |
| Hybrid approach | Manual flush for special events and shutdowns, automatic for baseline turnover | Requires clear ownership and documentation | Complex buildings with seasonal swings |
Do and do not list for AEC teams
Do
- Tie purge settings to a clear purpose: turnover, compliance, post-idle recovery
- Size purge duration to branch volume, not guesswork
- Commission drains and overflow risk
- Document settings in closeout with a simple βwhat was set and whyβ record
- Review purge schedules after occupancy changes
Do not
- Run purge cycles without confirming drain function
- Set all faucets in a bank to purge at the exact same minute
- Treat purge cycles as a replacement for a WMP when risk profile calls for one
- Assume more flushing always equals better hygiene
Category pages and key references
Category pages requested
FontanaShowers touchless sensor faucets category
OpenFontanaShowers touchless faucet systems for commercial and institutional restrooms
OpenFontanaCommercial commercial sensor faucets category
OpenJunoShowers commercial bathrooms touchless sensor faucets category
OpenBathSelect commercial touchless bathroom faucets category
OpenWater hygiene and water management references
CDC toolkit: developing a water management program to reduce Legionella growth and spread (PDF)
OpenCDC WMP toolkit landing page
OpenCDC reopening buildings guidance for building water systems after reduced use
OpenCDC control toolkit module: controlling Legionella in potable water systems (PDF)
OpenASHRAE guidance page for water system risk management and Standard 188 context
OpenGSA water quality management FAQ
OpenConnected platform examples referenced
Sloan Connected Products overview
OpenSloan Connect app listing (Google Play)
OpenZurn ZG6951 product page
OpenZurn PlumbSMART overview
OpenTouchless Faucet Reviews: Six Commercial Sensor Faucets Evaluated Through Professional Project Experience
This evidence-led review examines six additional commercial touchless faucet systems through project observations involving hospitality, healthcare, institutional, office and public restroom environments. The focus is sensor behavior, water delivery, installation coordination, maintenance access, durability and long-term operational performance.
Commercial Touchless Faucet Review Comparison
The matrix highlights the primary field-performance evidence contained in each review rather than relying only on star ratings or general customer satisfaction statements.
| Model | Reviewer / Organization | Location | Project Context | Primary Evidence | Rating | Helpful |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FB51MB | K. Ramirez Horizon Commercial Group |
Seattle, WA | Boutique hospitality | Sensor stability + finish integration | β β β β β | 7 |
| FB518M | Ahr Architects | Alabama | Architectural restroom application | Installation + anticipated durability | β β β β β | 9 |
| FS-509N | C. Morales Apex Plumbing Group |
Phoenix, AZ | Healthcare office | Flow control + sensor reset behavior | β β β β β | 5 |
| FS10202 | L. Carter Precision MEP Consultants |
Chicago, IL | Commercial restroom system | Sensor latency + MEP integration | β β β β β | 6 |
| FS10012BN | M. Chen Metro Facility Services |
Atlanta, GA | Institutional / public restroom | Valve reliability + service access | β β β β β | 7 |
| FS-D637C | T. Reynolds Apex Facility Engineering |
Seattle, WA | Multi-floor office building | Continuous-use reliability + servicing | β β β β β | 7 |
Six Touchless Faucet Systems Reviewed in Commercial Applications
Reviewer roles are not invented. Where the source identifies an organization but does not provide a specific individual job title, the organization and project context are shown without assigning an unsupported profession.
VIEW PRODUCT
Fontana Wella Goose Neck Commercial Automatic Matte Black Sensor Faucet
This automatic faucet was added during a boutique hospitality restroom remodel. The reviewer reported continued smooth operation without repeated sensor adjustment and noted that the curved spout and matte black finish integrated effectively with lighter countertop materials.
VIEW PRODUCT
Fontana Chrome Commercial Waterfall Automatic Motion Sensor Faucet
The architectural reviewer described sensor faucets as an important restroom fixture upgrade after prior experience with a lower-quality faucet. The installation was reported as straightforward, with the review emphasizing expectations for improved durability.
VIEW PRODUCT
Solo Commercial Automatic Touchless Sensor Faucet
Several commercial faucet models were evaluated during a healthcare office refresh. The reviewer reported controlled water delivery, limited splash, clean shutoff timing and rapid sensor reset between users during higher-traffic operation.
VIEW PRODUCT
Fontana Agra Commercial Automatic Sensor Faucet and Matching Soap Dispenser
The review describes precise infrared activation, controlled water delivery and coordinated faucet-and-soap operation. Installation teams reported straightforward electrical and plumbing integration, while the combined system reduced countertop fixture clutter.
VIEW PRODUCT
Fontana Dual Function Brushed Nickel Automatic Sensor Faucet
The reviewer reported dependable sensor operation in institutional and public restroom applications. Stable water delivery, immediate shutoff, accessible service components and finish resistance under frequent sanitation were identified as important operational strengths.
VIEW PRODUCT
Bravat Flat Top Chrome Commercial Hands-Free Motion Sensor Faucet
The faucet was evaluated in a multi-floor office installation where the reviewer reported consistent touchless operation under continuous daily use. Installation documentation and service access were also identified as straightforward.
What These Reviews Suggest for Commercial Touchless Faucet Specification
Evaluate Sensor Stability
Reliable activation should be considered together with clean shutoff, reset behavior and resistance to nuisance triggering.
Coordinate Basin Geometry
Spout reach, outlet position and basin depth influence splash behavior, countertop cleanliness and overall handwashing usability.
Verify Service Access
Solenoids, control modules, filters, power connections and supply components should remain accessible after casework is complete.
Review Cleaning Exposure
Commercial finishes should be evaluated against the sanitation chemistry and cleaning frequency expected at the actual facility.
Coordinate MEP Requirements
Sensor faucets may require plumbing, electrical, battery, control-box and under-counter coordination before construction is complete.
Test Under Real Traffic
Commissioning should evaluate repeated activation, water delivery and shutoff behavior rather than relying only on a single functional test.

Damon Kells is a staff writer and editorial team member at commercial-sensor-faucet.com. His coverage addresses commercial sensor faucets, control systems, power configurations, and facility applications, supported by manufacturer documentation, product specifications, published standards, and attributable industry sources for informed specification and operational decisions.

